Bilingual Education Home

Faculty

Undergraduate Program

Graduate Program

Scholarships

Student Organizations

Course Catalogs

Course Schedules

Endorsements

Forms

News & Important Events

Morelia Educational Experience

Field Experience to San Antonio

Syllabi

Related Links

Contact Us

College of Education Home

Position Announcements

 


 

Boise State University

Teacher Education Course Syllabus

Fall 2008

Course: The Bilingual ESL Curriculum

Course Number:  ED-BLESL 500 Section:  1130-50 Schedule: Fri 4:00-10:00 Sat 8:00-5:00  

Instructor:   Arturo Rodriguez, Ph.D. Office: Tues-  BSU West- 1 hour before to 1 hour after class.  Twin Falls- 1 hour before to one hour after class

E-Mail:  arturorodriguez@boisestate.edu Phone: 426-4438 Fax:  426-4006

Conceptual Framework:  The Professional Educator

Boise State University strives to develop knowledgeable educators who integrate complex roles and dispositions in the service of diverse communities of learners. Believing that all children, adolescents, and adults can learn, educators dedicate themselves to supporting that learning.  Using effective approaches that promote high levels of student achievement, educators create environments that prepare learners to be citizens who contribute to a complex world.  Educators serve learners as reflective practitioners, scholars and artists, problem solvers, and partners.

Standards and Assessments

 

Standards/Indicators Addressed

 

 

Assessment Method

 

Standard 1: 

3.  The teacher understands and knows how to identify differences in bilingual programs and ENL approaches (Bilingual: dual language, maintenance, transitional, early and late exit, etc.; ENL: sheltered English, academic support, tutorial, extended day, etc.).

Disposition

2. The teacher appreciates the similarities and differences between cultures as well as the contributions of various cultures.

Performance

1.  The teacher uses knowledge of content areas to establish goals, design curricula and instruction, and facilitate student learning in a manner that builds on students’ linguistic and cultural diversity.

 

Personal journal; Research Project, Research paper, Critical Policy analysis: Program Evaluation.

Overview:

Current issues and their political ramifications in the fields of education especially: Literacy, Bilingual/Multicultural education, and English as a Second Language. Analysis and critique of current trends and programs in education and creating an awareness of how teachers can enhance their advocacy for students, parents, and stakeholders.

Course Learning Outcomes

By the end of the semester, you should have:

§         An understanding of Public Policy Analysis and Program Evaluation

§         A broader understanding of federal and state literacy and bilingual education policy.

§         An in-depth understanding of  the means by which Federal and State educational policies limit or ensure school district program success.

§         Developed strategies that show a critical understanding of ways to support language learning.

§         Connected curriculum to the understandings, perspectives, identities, and cultures of students

Texts 

Garcia, Ofelia. et. al. (2006). Imagining multilingual schools. Clevedon-Buffalo-Toronto: Multilingual

Matters Limited 

Tse, Lucy. (2001). Why don’t they learn English. New York: Teachers College Press

Grading

Grading Scale: A+ to A=Outstanding A- to B=Good B- to C=Acceptable

A-Reserved for exemplary work. Your work shows deep thought, analysis, and synthesis of the readings and activities. You made connections among the readings and with your learning experience. You shared with your classmates; examined your biases and prejudices and were willing to make changes based on new information. You attended class in both body and spirit.

B-Distinguished work. You fulfilled all the assignments according to specifications. You were present most of the time. You did the readings, but didn’t really get into them or make personal connections, either to our own life or to your service learning experience. Sometimes you shared in class. You were able to embrace some new ideas and information.

C-Average work. You fulfilled the assignments minimally. If you did all the readings, you didn’t really get below the surface to the deeper issues. You made few connections among the readings, activities or service learning experience. You rarely entered into the discussions in class. You have made few changes in your thinking about diversity, democracy, equity and social justice.

D-Below average work. Attendance and participation were sporadic. You didn’t really enter into the learning opportunities presented to you. Assignments were completed in a haphazard, slipshod manner that shows lack of planning, commitment, and deep thought.

F-You put nothing into this class.  

Assignments:

Percentage of Grade

Description of Assignment

Due Date

 15

Weekly Journal writing

One entry per week.  Conduct research on Language and literacy acquisition.  See Products for guidance.

 

September to November

20

Weekly electronic discussion

Share and respond to the weekly discussions posted via webct. We will consider important questions that arise from your/our discussions, in-depth interviews and or class, which may help to focus your personal inquiry project. Please respond to my question first and then at least one other response from someone in the group.

 

Weekly postings due no later than Sun midnight.

45

Research Paper: Topic of Choice but using the following added focus: Issues in supporting the acquisition of Language & Literacy.  

 

Session I First draft

(not graded)

Session II First full draft (graded 15 points)

Session III, 2008 Final copy (graded 30 points)

20

In-depth Interview: Please see a more complete description under the heading products.

 

Second session.

 

ADA:  Students needing support other than what is written into the syllabus please see me as soon as possible before or after class, or make an appointment to speak with me.  I will make accommodations as needed.  We will work together to ensure that you receive a rigorous academic experience while being responsive to your particular situation. 

POLICIES:

ATTENDANCE AND PARTICIPATION (on going)

You are expected to be well prepared to participate.  This means that you have read and reflected on the assigned readings and are clearly involved in group discussions and activities. Missing or late assignments will negatively affect your grade. Turning in late work may result in the loss of a letter grade, you may be dropped from the course or receive an incomplete.

The only exceptions to this rule are true family emergencies or serious illness that you have discussed with me in advance. 

Papers: Papers should be typed using APA style. All papers should be carefully proof read (use spell-check and an outside editor; a friend or colleague), and turned in as clean and clear of form as possible.  

Academic honesty

Cheating or plagiarism in any form is unacceptable. The University functions to promote the cognitive and psychosocial development of all students. Therefore, all work submitted by a student must represent her/his own ideas, concepts, and current understanding. Academic dishonesty also includes submitting substantial portions of the same academic course work to more than one course for credit without prior permission of the instructor(s).

Products 

Personal Journal 

Keep a weekly journal that covers your experiences during this component of your education.  Each entry in your journal should be one page, typed using APA style.  Submit your journal to me once weekly by Friday midnight during the days posted.  A final copy is due at the end of the semester.  

Notes on writing the research paper:

For this product it is important that you write at length given the subject (12 page minimum not including title page and references).  Several items are essential when you write for this course: use APA style, your knowledge/perspective and a well developed theoretical framework.  A research paper may contain a: a clear topic, concise thesis statement and or research question/s. But, write until you have covered the subject with enough depth to reflect your knowledge.  The final copy, what is your/our analysis of the world; we may agree or disagree.  Finally revise, revise and proofread.  The first draft will include your topic and a rough sketch or outline.  What do you propose to write about?  The second draft will be more complete several pages, your ruminations and some support for your arguments.  The final draft is as stated. 

In-Depth Interview: 

As part of this class you will conduct an in-depth free flowing interview of a person who considers her/himself in the beginning stages of learning to speak read or write, preferably and adolescent or adult learner. You must conduct a thorough investigation into your informant’s life (final product will be an essay, 5 page minimum).  The purpose of this product is for you to gain as thorough an understanding of your informant’s lived reality.  You might begin by posing a question: What is your background? 

Supplementary References (not required but helpful) 

Anzaldua, Gloria. (1999). Borderlands/la frontera: The New Mestiza. San Francisco, CA:

Aunt Lute Books. 

Freire, Paulo. (1970).  Pedagogy of the oppressed.  New York:  Continuum.

Freire, Paulo. & Macedo Donaldo (1987).  Literacy: Reading the word and the world.  Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey. 

** I reserve the right to change, add to or subtract from, the content of the syllabus, due dates, assignments, schedule and calendar as necessary throughout the semester.